Frisk does not yet know what happened in this bed. Mind you, this is still the pacifist run and white-text.Дespite not knowing everything, they know what happened here. They react to this bed only, and pass this rather morbid, off-handed remark here. This narrator knows something about this bed that makes it different from the bed on the right. So we return to this neutral/pacifist line: The narrator doesnвЂ™t know everything and can learn or be proven wrong. They also think ShyrenвЂ™s tone deaf until Frisk starts singing with herвЂ¦ вЂ¦and they seem a little dismayed to find there was something worth the repeated checks after all. In addition narratorвЂ™s inconsistent botany knowledge, when you check the snow poffs in Snowdin, the narrator also shows a reaction to something they didnвЂ™t know before (after indulging in some serious sarcasm at FriskвЂ™s incessant checking) No one had to teach the narrator what this rare species of flower was name, even though they didnвЂ™t know what the common water sausage was called. They seem excited, too.ДЄnd they may not have known what a water sausage was called, but they knew what a golden flowerВ looked like when they saw it at the very start, before anyone has even mentioned them or pointed them out. There is no reason the narrator should fail to know something so obvious this soon in the game.

ItвЂ™s another line that seems out of place the first time you see it - shouldnвЂ™t the narrator know everything? YouвЂ™ve taught the narrator? Narrators, as you know, are supposed to be informative and helpful. They only seem to know what Frisk knows, and what they know.ДЄt first, they donвЂ™t know what the plant in TorielвЂ™s hallway is any more than Frisk does. Most importantly, the narrator only had this reaction to CharaвЂ™s bed. That sort of comment, especially in the pacifist run, is probably enough to make you squint and go вЂњthe fuck, my dudeвЂќ. ThatвЂ™s a pretty morbid comment to make вЂњIf you laid down here you might not get upвЂќ. WhatвЂ™s so special about the left one? Why is it this one that prompts this reaction? There itвЂ™s just described as a вЂњtwin-sizedвЂќ bed.Д«ut the narrator has a reaction upon seeing the bed on the left in the Pacifist route.

Nothing seems off about this in the pacifist run. Here, we see the Chara describe the bed on the right as AsrielвЂ™s bed. It has most of the information known so far that supports the theory, and then some. ItвЂ™s finally done!ДЄs a good portion (though not all) of this post is based on the well-known вЂњChara is the narratorвЂќ theory, first and foremost, this section has to be here to provide the base of the post. If you liked the animation, and like Chara (or donвЂ™t like Chara) then please consider reading the meta. The result is what could conceivably be called thorough.Д¬ompared to the animation I made as the header, the postвЂ™s content was much harder to put together and write I consider the animation icing on the cake.

Uh, so IвЂ™ve been working on this meta post for around 3 months now, gathering screenshots, gathering feedback, gathering more screenshots.

Undertale who is chara